Back to Crafty Games Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2013, 05:33:23 AM
Home Help Search Login Register
News: Welcome to the Crafty Games Forums!

Note to New Members: To combat spam, we have instituted new rules: you must post 5 replies to existing threads before you can create new threads.

+  Crafty Games Forum
|-+  Community
| |-+  Off-Topic
| | |-+  A thought.
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: A thought.  (Read 611 times)
Mister Andersen
Control
******
Posts: 8906


I'm leaving for a destination I still don't know


View Profile
« on: March 20, 2010, 02:50:49 AM »

Should there be a law protecting deployed service personnel from being served with a divorce? Because it seems to me that divorcing someone who is away and likely undergoing trauma in the service of their country is a low and repugnant act. Especially iof the marriage occurred while the person was already enlisted.
« Last Edit: March 20, 2010, 03:05:22 AM by Mister Andersen » Logged

ThunderMonkey
Control
******
Posts: 2148



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2010, 02:32:10 PM »

Should there be a law protecting deployed service personnel from being served with a divorce? Because it seems to me that divorcing someone who is away and likely undergoing trauma in the service of their country is a low and repugnant act. Especially iof the marriage occurred while the person was already enlisted.

I don't think so. Granted it's a cowardly act to divorce someone that is deployed, but I believe there are scenarios in which that we can't even fathom that it would be a bad idea not to do so.
Logged

Work done by an officer's doppleganger in a parallel universe cannot be claimed as overtime.
Aragathor
Handler
*****
Posts: 707


The Black Mouse


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2010, 03:02:01 PM »

Quote
Should there be a law protecting deployed service personnel from being served with a divorce?
No, forbidding it outright would cut into too many freedoms. What could be done is a special law that would effectively freeze the proceedings and make it a crime to appropriate possessions.
This would protect the serviceman/-woman from coming home and facing the fact that his ex took everything he/she owned.

Quote
Because it seems to me that divorcing someone who is away and likely undergoing trauma in the service of their country is a low and repugnant act.
Of course it is low, but we humans define ourselves by the ability to go lower than a snake full of buckshot.
Logged

Proud member of the Crafty Freelancer Posse®.

True nobility can not be inherited, it must be achieved.

"Endure and thrive."
MilitiaJim
Control
******
Posts: 3890



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2010, 07:10:21 PM »

A divorce against a deployed US service man or woman will not proceed until they return.  This goes for most legal actions.
Logged

"Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est."  ("A sword is never a killer, it's a tool  in the killer's hands.")
- Lucius Annaeus Seneca "the younger" ca. (4 BC - 65 AD)
Psion
Control
******
Posts: 1517



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 20, 2010, 09:51:36 PM »

A divorce against a deployed US service man or woman will not proceed until they return.  This goes for most legal actions.

Define "deployed". 'Cause my ex divorced my while I was on a deterrent patrol.
Logged

The Secret Volcano Base: my RPG blog currently discussing Fantasy Craft and Freeport!
MilitiaJim
Control
******
Posts: 3890



View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: March 20, 2010, 10:26:34 PM »

A divorce against a deployed US service man or woman will not proceed until they return.  This goes for most legal actions.
Define "deployed". 'Cause my ex divorced my while I was on a deterrent patrol.
Well for me they pushed back a speeding ticket court date until I came back from a Title 10 National Guard mobilization.  A couple of my buddies had divorces start, but the court appearance parts waited until they came home.

I want to say that your ex's lawyer pulled a fast one on JAG, or JAG just wasn't doing their job, since your inability to appear in court should have held up the whole matter until you could appear.
Logged

"Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est."  ("A sword is never a killer, it's a tool  in the killer's hands.")
- Lucius Annaeus Seneca "the younger" ca. (4 BC - 65 AD)
glimmerrat
Control
******
Posts: 3518


Iconoclast


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2010, 02:08:15 AM »

Bear in mind for some women such circumstance are the only way of escaping an abusive relationship. Why should they let other people guilt-trip them into staying in the relationship? That's pretty fucked. I've known someone in that very situation, so please understand that there are extenuating (sp?) circumstances for some people, and not all soldiers are patriotic angels. They're people, and just like everyone else some of them are great, and some are pricks.

That said, I don't know what the situation is in the UK, but I do hope it's the same as in the US. At the very least the legal procedings should be delayed until said person's return.
Logged

VAO Control; Crafty Freelancer; Freethinker

"If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world."
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!