Author Topic: So. Who else thinks Feruchemy is the best thing EVAR?  (Read 5876 times)

Allan53

  • Crafty n00b
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: So. Who else thinks Feruchemy is the best thing EVAR?
« Reply #15 on: August 08, 2009, 06:14:28 PM »
Rather than a 1:1 ratio (in d20, for example, losing 1 point of Strength now for a point of Strength later), you could make it a 2:1, 3:1, or even 5:1 cost (depending upon the scale and the utility of the power being charged).

Interesting idea, and probably workable in game terms, however story wise a bit of a downer (yeah, I'm being picky, I know). Feruchemy was of Preservation, which meant decay would be contrary to that.

Agent 333

  • Control
  • ******
  • Posts: 2093
    • View Profile
Re: So. Who else thinks Feruchemy is the best thing EVAR?
« Reply #16 on: August 09, 2009, 12:28:01 AM »
Allowmancy was of Preservation. Feruchemy was of Balance. (And for completeness sake, Hematalurgy was of Ruin.)
When all your problems are nails, all your tools start looking like hammers.

Tathel

  • Specialist
  • *
  • Posts: 6
    • View Profile
Re: So. Who else thinks Feruchemy is the best thing EVAR?
« Reply #17 on: August 17, 2009, 10:01:14 AM »
hmmm well just off the top of my head i would say that metallic purity could perhaps be a factor in the exchange ratio of storing an ability. We know that in allomancy the metal's purity--and ratio when mixed into an alloy--is important. Incorrect mixtures don't work right and can make the user sick when burning. It's not strictly said in the books but perhaps you could extrapolate from this that the purer / better mixed the metal is the better the exchange ratio. And perhaps this could be true for all metallic magics.

Although I tend to think that really all Feruchemy is a 1:1, and would prefer that it stays that way in the rules... in the interest of game balance something like that might be possible.