Back to Crafty Games Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 18, 2013, 11:29:26 AM
Home Help Search Login Register
News: Welcome to the Crafty Games Forums!

Note to New Members: To combat spam, we have instituted new rules: you must post 5 replies to existing threads before you can create new threads.

+  Crafty Games Forum
|-+  Community
| |-+  Off-Topic
| | |-+  G.I. Joe: Resolute
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] Go Down Print
Author Topic: G.I. Joe: Resolute  (Read 6833 times)
Mister Andersen
Control
******
Posts: 8877


I'm leaving for a destination I still don't know


View Profile
« Reply #60 on: April 26, 2009, 11:02:20 AM »

(click to show/hide)
Logged

Gentry
Powered By Publisher
Control
******
Posts: 2676


It's a Trap!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #61 on: April 26, 2009, 01:04:56 PM »

Hmm.  Kind of a letdown at the end. I certainly wish we'd been able to meet more Joes, especially with Duke so conveniently wounded.
Logged

I'm a secret VAO Control (Shh!)

Check out Wyrmstone for FC Open Source campaigning

Have you joined Knife Rights yet?

Live and game in Flyover Country? Join Tornado Alley Game Guil
Aldus Vertten
Handler
*****
Posts: 647


Los Otros Planes


View Profile WWW
« Reply #62 on: April 26, 2009, 01:13:41 PM »

Hmm.  Kind of a letdown at the end. I certainly wish we'd been able to meet more Joes, especially with Duke so conveniently wounded.

From the Warren Ellis Blog

Quote
FAQ: why do so many “important” GI JOE characters have little or no dialogue? Simple. Budget. Voice actors cost money. I originally wrote WAY too many speaking roles, and had to remove a bunch of them in the second draft of RESOLUTE, move some dialogue from excised characters to remaining characters, and so on. We could only support so many speaking roles. So some of your favourites didn’t get a line.
Logged

"No queda sino batirnos"
-------------
-El Capitan Alatriste
Mister Andersen
Control
******
Posts: 8877


I'm leaving for a destination I still don't know


View Profile
« Reply #63 on: April 26, 2009, 01:36:20 PM »

I reckon that once a Joe's in and they die, the person brought in specifically to replace them inherits the codename. So KittyPryde hot new Dial Tone is simply the original's replacement, not his reimagining.

Because I loved the Marvel comic's habit of routinely killing off old characters to give the new year's range airtime
Logged

Txabier_Arrizotegui
Agent
***
Posts: 116


Upload, download & payload. The works.


View Profile
« Reply #64 on: April 26, 2009, 08:58:42 PM »

This Dial Tone is the original's lil' sister.

Trust me on that one.  Cool

Now, that I've seen the last episode, I just can't help but think it was rushed or not well thought-out, at least.

Let the "budget" issues and not "enough Joes" (as if in any doggone episode on the old series or comic books you got to see twenty of them running about... it's exactly the same formula here). It just got to end too quickly and without something more interesting.

Still, anticlimatic and all, I'm glad they did something with the franchise... I for one hated the lasers and zero lethality in the original series.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2009, 11:08:49 AM by Txabier_Arrizotegui » Logged

Fight on principle, question everything, be just and fair. Live FREE!
VisualStatic
Control
******
Posts: 1104



View Profile
« Reply #65 on: April 27, 2009, 06:12:17 PM »

so that was really a pretty good show but is it just me or did that seem anti-climatic in the last episode?
Logged

--
Heroes don't die, they just reload.
--
A Master of the Dark Arts of System Administration.
Txabier_Arrizotegui
Agent
***
Posts: 116


Upload, download & payload. The works.


View Profile
« Reply #66 on: April 27, 2009, 09:57:06 PM »

I think at least 5 of us agree with you.

Anti-climatic after the nice build-up, but hey I felt the same with many of the original series episodes.
Logged

Fight on principle, question everything, be just and fair. Live FREE!
Forcegypsy
Handler
*****
Posts: 689





View Profile
« Reply #67 on: April 27, 2009, 10:39:51 PM »

Didn't really like the finale. Favourite episode was the ninja showdown.
Logged
Mister Andersen
Control
******
Posts: 8877


I'm leaving for a destination I still don't know


View Profile
« Reply #68 on: April 30, 2009, 06:10:31 PM »

Not Resolute, but...

With only a handful of specials and a run of Hamlet to occupy his time this year, it looks David Tennant is grabbing himself some face time in the prequels to the forthcoming GI Joe movie.

Issue 1 focuses on a pre-Joe era Duke on a mission in Papua New Guinnea, taking out an unknown party's ground station with which they've stolen control of a spy sat. Tennant has more of a supporting role in this, and there's a couple of places where we get a really good look. Here, where they're planning on how to hit the ground station:

(click to show/hide)

and then again when things start going a bit pear shaped after the hostiles twig onto the deception that allows our heroes to hack the override:

(click to show/hide)

After blowing the station, they lug the wounded to an evac and Duke, as the team leader, gets offered a spot on the GI Joe team which he refuses though the general recruiting him intimates the offer will be made again.


Next issue we're following Destro as we learn the 4 secrets to his family's success as dynasty of arms dealers, which mostly come down to the French & their country suck. Here, Destro is kicking back in his private jet which is parking at Paris airport and look who happens to be walking past at the time but a couple that look suspiciously like the Doctor & Martha:

(click to show/hide)

There are more than a few times in the 2nd issue when you could be forgiven for thinking you're reading a 9th Doctor comic. It really doesn't help that Destro's essentially wearing the 9th Doctor's costume
« Last Edit: April 30, 2009, 06:12:42 PM by Mister Andersen » Logged

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.13 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!